Computers and Litigation Support
List Price: $ 51.00 Price:
Find More Computer Litigation Products
What is Patent Infringement?
we need to understand whether patent infringement has occurred or not, and in order to verify the infringement it is necessary to determine the scope of protection of the patented invention, basically from the patent specification and patent claims. Thereafter, it is important to study the interpretation of the wording (“literal infringement”), which is the basic rule of patent infringement. What is meant by literal infringement? Literal infringement is nothing but when all the elements in the infringing product are present in the claimed product. Sometimes, assessing literal infringement only would not establish the grounds of patent infringement. Even though some elements may not be literally infringing, we will have to study whether the elements are “performing substantially the same function, in substantially the same way, and accomplish the same result”. This step is referred to as, the “doctrine of equivalence”. The above analysis can be performed with the help of patent attorneys/patent lawyer, who has the techno-legal background.
Do you know who is liable for patent infringement? Your answer may be the actual manufacturer of infringing product, but also the users of the patented invention or others who are indirectly connected with such infringing activity, are liable for infringement.
There are various ways of establishing patent infringement and a suit for infringement must be instituted within 3 years from the date on which the plaintiff first knew the infringement (Under Section 88). The plaintiff can be i) the patentee, i.e., the person registered in the Register of Patents as the grantee or proprietor of the patent, or ii) t he holder of an exclusive license provided the license is registered, or iii) The holder of a compulsory license; in the event the patentee fails to institute proceedings on the request of the compulsory license holder, or iv) an assignee of a patent provided an application for registration of assignment has been filed before the date of filing the suit; or v) a co-owner of a patent is not expressly entitled in the Act to bring an action for infringement on his own without joining the others.
Now, the question of interest would be whether a third party would be liable for an infringement if the patent has lapsed. The answer is not liable for an infringement. The immunity is from the date on which the patent has lapsed till the application for restoration, if filed, is advertised in the official gazette. In case the patentee has not cared to restore his patent within the prescribed period, the patent lapses and the invention would become the public domain.
In case any person receives notice of infringement, the person should take the following necessary steps: i) first find out the patent number of the invention from the person who sent the notice; ii) check the patent is in force or not from the patent office; iii) check if the person who sent the notice is the registered proprietor of the patent; iv) in case the above steps are positive, procure a copy of the specification from the patent office and study it in detail, and v) if the patentee (the person who sent the notice) has a good case, the person should either drop the working of that invention or attempt at procuring a license from the patentee.
Finally, I would like to point out that the patented invention can be used for research purposes without any liability for infringement.
Senthil is a registered patent agent with Indian patent office. He has the right combination of Technology, Management and Intellectual Property. Senthil is also an Inventor in seven patent applications, in the area of Product Design, Instrumentation and Process control. And also I am running a patent blog http://indiapatents.blogspot.com
Do You Own Your SaaS Website? Part 1: 5 Copyright Myths Debunked
Copyright © 2009 Chip Cooper
Your SaaS website represents an important investment. It may produce income for you – maybe even a lot of income… either now or in the future.
What if someone made you an offer to buy your website – an offer you can’t refuse? Do you really own your website and all of its components? Could you transfer clear ownership to the buyer? Or does the deal fall through because, upon close examination, you really don’t own it – or key parts of it?
Your Website’s Components If you want to analyze the ownership of your SaaS website, you need to think in terms of its component parts. These include:
* web pages – these are the pages that you navigate on your site;
* content – the text, images, audio, and video that you integrate into your web pages;
* background software – software that runs in the background that provides functionality to your web pages, such as the software that generates your online service, shopping cart software, affiliate tracking software, toolbars for maneuvering between pages, search engines, Java applets, and ActiveX controls; and
* opt-in and customer lists. Except for your opt-in and customer lists, copyright plays a significant role in the ownership all of these components – so, it’s a good place to start.
In simple terms, copyright ownership is really important because the copyright owner controls the exclusive right to copy, modify, distribute, and display the works of authorship that are embodied in your website.
Perhaps the best way to approach copyright ownership as it relates to your website is to debunk some of the myths that are floating around.
Myth No. 1: To Be a Copyright Owner, You Must Register With The Copyright Office
Not true.
How copyrights are created is really simple, and that’s why it’s so often misunderstood.
The Copyright Act states that a work is “created” when it is fixed in a tangible medium of expression. This means that a copyrightable work of authorship is created when pen hits paper, or keystrokes are recorded into the RAM of a computer.
Creation of copyrights happens automatically when an original work of authorship is fixed; no registration or other act is required. You might think of this as the “Rule of Automatic Copyright”.
What does this mean to you? The author of a copyrightable work is the copyright owner. And since ownership happens automatically, if the work is not registered, there is no paper trail stating who the author is. This fact has significant ramifications if you need permission from the copyright owner.
Myth No. 2: I Paid My Website Developer To Develop My Site, Therefore I Own It
Not true in most cases.
The general rule is that the creator of the original expression in your website is the author and copyright owner.
An exception to the general rule lies with the “work made for hire” rules which come into play when a person hires another to create a copyrightable work of authorship. This is the situation that is most common with website development.
Facts are critical regarding the operation of the “work made for hire” rules. The key determination is the status of the website developer — was the developer your regular employee, or was the developer a contractor? In most cases, the developer is a contractor.
The “work made for hire” rules are quite different depending on the status of the developer as employee or contractor, as follows:
* if the developer is an employee acting within the scope of employment, the hiring party (you) will be deemed to be the author and copyright owner of the work product; but
* if the developer is a contractor, then the contractor will be deemed to be the author and copyright owner unless there is a written agreement, signed by the contractor, specifying that the work is a “work made for hire”.
What does this mean to you? Typically, the developer is a contractor. For this reason, to be the author and copyright owner of your website, you must have a written agreement, signed by the developer that specifies that the work product is a “work made for hire”. Failing any of these requirements, the developer will be the author and copyright owner of the work product (i.e. your website).
Myth No. 3: It’s OK to Use Materials I Copy Off The Web Because They’re In The Public Domain
Not true.
The Internet is a public medium, but materials published on the Internet are not necessarily in the public domain.
Under the Rule of Automatic Copyright, the author of any original work of authorship will be the copyright owner. The author-owner has the exclusive right to control the copying, modification, distribution, and public display of the work. Anyone who exercises any of these exclusive rights without permission (i.e. a license) from the copyright owner, is liable for copyright infringement.
Public domain works are not subject to copyright. These include works for which copyright protection has expired.
What does this mean to you? Copyrights for most works published on the Web are owned by someone. You might be tempted to grab text or graphics on another site for use on your own site, but you’ll need permission (i.e. a license) from the copyright owner to use these materials, else you’ll be an infringer.
Myth No. 4: It’s OK to Use Anything That Doesn’t Have a Copyright Notice.
Not true in most cases.
A copyright notice is not required for works created and published since 1978.
What does this mean to you? For post-1978 published works, you must have permission from the copyright owner to use the work.
Myth No. 5: It’s OK to Use Anything If I Give the Author Credit or Include The Author’s Copyright Notice
Not true.
In the academic world, if you use someone else’s ideas, you must give credit, usually in the form of a footnote.
In the commercial world, the issue is not whether you give credit or provide the owner’s copyright notice; rather, it’s whether you have permission (i.e. a license) to use.
What does this mean to you? If you use someone else’s copyrighted work, get permission first. Sometimes permission is difficult to obtain because as pointed out in Myth No. 1, if the work is not registered, there is no paper trail stating the identity of the copyright owner.
Conclusion
Ownership of your SaaS website is relatively complex – you must consider all of the components of your site and determine ownership for each separately.
Copyright is the fundamental intellectual property protection scheme for website components. Understanding the difference between copyright facts and myths is critical to understanding who owns these components.
Leading Internet, IP and software lawyer Chip Cooper has automated the process of drafting website documents for small websites with his MyLegalFirewall website documents drafting service. Discover how quick, easy, and cost-effective it is to determine which legal compliance documents you need and to draft them online, and claim your FREE Special Report, Determine Which Legal Documents Your Website Really Needs, at ==> http://digicontracts.com/
Find More Computer Copyright Infringement Articles